qyfff

qyfff

new to here
HomeArchives

Further Research on Modification and Deletion of xLog

#xlog35
AI Translation
This post is translated from Chinese into English through AI.View Original
AI-generated summary
The article discusses the modification and deletion processes in xLog, highlighting that these actions do not affect the original files. Updates involve providing a new CID to the cache, while deletions only add a transaction to the blockchain, allowing articles to remain accessible via their original links. Users can trace all transactions related to an account, including comments and content, even if articles are deleted or modified. The blockchain's transparency and traceability have both advantages and disadvantages for users. While content can be traced back, the association between an account and a person is less rigid compared to traditional web2 platforms, where identity verification is often required. This allows users to easily create new accounts without the risk of bans. However, the article expresses concern that the lack of control over harmful content could lead to chaos in the community. Currently, the platform attracts a more educated user base, which may mitigate these issues for now. The author questions whether blockchain is truly suitable for blogging, considering data ownership and the uncontrollable nature of public opinion. Feedback from readers is encouraged.

Previous article:

Loading...

View the code for further analysis of the xLog modification and deletion process, the general process is as follows:

image

We can further confirm that the two operations of deletion and modification do not affect the source file in any way. Updating involves handing a new CID to the cache, while deletion can only add a deletion transaction to the blockchain, hiding the article in the frontend, but it can still be accessed through the original link.

For example, we can find such information at the bottom of any blog post, and by clicking on the owner, we can query all transactions under the owner's account address, allowing us to see all comments, article content, update content, etc. After entering the transaction details, we can find the corresponding IPFS link to locate the original text, regardless of whether the original text has been deleted or modified.

image

image

The blockchain has two properties: transparency and traceability.

You can look up all transactions of an account from the account address, which means you can query all the text published by that account on xLog, including modification records and deleted articles.

For individual users, there are pros and cons, as the content may be traceable. However, on the other hand, the binding relationship between this address and a person is not as strong; in many web2 communities, one needs to bind their ID to be allowed to speak. If we no longer want a certain account, we can quickly reopen a new one and start outputting text again, whereas in web2, one might face account bans and certain risks.

For the community, I still believe the disadvantages outweigh the advantages; it is too free. If harmful content (hate, rumors, cyberbullying, etc.) appears, and the platform lacks control capabilities, this is bound to lead to chaos.

Of course, at this stage, those who can access this platform are still relatively educated individuals, so the above issues should not arise for now. Moreover, the community aspect of this blog is not very strong; everyone is more focused on managing their own blogs.

Is blockchain really suitable for blogging?

  • Data belongs to oneself, not kidnapped by the platform? Balancing data ownership? Convenience?
  • Data does not seem to fully belong to oneself
  • There is still the uncontrollability of public opinion

We hope to hear your thoughts.

Loading...
Ownership of this post data is guaranteed by blockchain and smart contracts to the creator alone.